Working Backwards vs Design Thinking

Design Thinking diverges to explore many solutions to a user need; Working Backwards converges on one and tests it in writing. Here's how they fit together.

In short

Design Thinking is an exploratory, divergent process - empathize, define, ideate, prototype, test - that generates many possible solutions to a user need. Working Backwards is convergent: it takes a chosen solution and pressure-tests it by writing the launch press release before building. Design Thinking helps you find ideas; Working Backwards helps you decide on one.

Side by side

DimensionWorking BackwardsDesign Thinking
ModeConvergent (decide)Divergent (explore)
Core artifactPR/FAQPrototypes & user research
Starts fromA candidate solutionDeep user empathy
StrengthRigorous go/no-goGenerating options
OutputA validated decisionTested concepts

When to use Working Backwards

  • You already have a candidate idea and need to decide on it.
  • You need a crisp, communicable case for a launch.
  • You want to kill weak ideas cheaply, on paper.

When to use Design Thinking

  • You're early and exploring many possible solutions.
  • You need deep user empathy before committing to a direction.
  • The problem space itself is still unclear.

The verdict

Use them in sequence: Design Thinking to discover and shape promising ideas, then Working Backwards to pressure-test the most promising one before you build it.

Write the press release before you write the code

Turn your idea into an Amazon-style PR/FAQ, a scored verdict, and a PRD - free to start.

Start your PR/FAQ
Working Backwards

Design by The Resonance | Powered by GPC – The AI Transformation Company

Working Backwards is an independent tool from The Resonance. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon.com, Inc., Working Backwards LLC, or the authors or publisher of Working Backwards: Insights, Stories, and Secrets from Inside Amazon. Amazon, Kindle, Prime, Alexa, and AWS are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates, referenced only to describe the methodology’s origin. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.